Friday 29th, March 2024
canara news

Tomorrow's floor test in Uttarakhand stayed till April 7

Published On : 30 Mar 2016   |  Reported By : Canaranews Network


Nainital, Mar 30 (PTI) The political drama in Uttarakhand acquired a new turn today with the Division Bench of High Court staying till April 7 the floor test in the Assembly that was slated for tomorrow.

The two-judge bench gave the relief to the Centre and Uttarkhand, now under central rule, which had challenged the order of the single judge U C Dhyani, who had directed a floor test tomorrow.

The bench headed by Chief Justice K M Joseph posted the matter for April 6 for final hearing on the writ petition filed by ousted Chief Minister Harish Rawat challenging the imposition of President's Rule in the state.

"In view of the consent of the parties that the writ petition be posted to 06-04-2016 for being disposed of finally, we direct that the order, which is impugned in these appeals will be kept in abeyance till 07-04-2016," said the bench, also comprising Justice V K Bist, in a brief order

The order came after Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the Centre, strongly opposed yesterday's order saying courts cannot interfere with the Presidential proclamation.

"How can a floor test be ordered when a Presidential proclamation is in force and the Assembly is in suspended animation," Rohatgi said.

He questioned for whom the floor test would be conducted since there is no government. He also asked who would be convening the session of Assembly which was in suspended animation.

The court asked AG what was the hurry for imposition of President's rule on March 27 as a floor test was scheduled for the next day and that would have been the best way to decide majority.

Justifying the Centre's action, the AG argued that "unconstitutional" developments had taken place in the Assembly on March 18 and horse-trading was underway.

According to the Centre, there was "breakdown of Constitutional machinery" when on March 18 the Appropriation Bill was declared as passed despite 35 out of 67 voting MLAs opposing it.

The AG argued that the Centre should be given a chance to explain its position on why the President's rule was imposed.

Rohatgi wondered how there could be two governments in place if the single-judge order was to be enforced.







More News

Bhagwat demands law for Ram temple construction in Ayodhya
Bhagwat demands law for Ram temple construction in Ayodhya
Break your silence on Rafale deal: Congress tells Modi
Break your silence on Rafale deal: Congress tells Modi
BJP's Shah says allegations against Minister Akbar need to be verified
BJP's Shah says allegations against Minister Akbar need to be verified

Write your Comments

Disclaimer: Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. canaranews.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that under 66A of the IT Act, sending offensive or menacing messages through electronic communication service and sending false messages to cheat, mislead or deceive people or to cause annoyance to them is punishable. It is obligatory on CANARANEWS to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using canaranews will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will canaranews.com be held responsible.